detailed description of the gas chamber and its functioning in Buchenwald
trouble is, there was none
cakes of 'human soap' made from Jewish cadavers,
claims later abandoned
skin of Jewish inmates tanned by Nazis,
analyzed decades later (!): turned out to be goat skin
More than half of the testimonies collected at Yad Vashem in Israel is considered 'unreliable'
by the museum itself
[Kra-Yad].
One striking thing is the number of blatant lies and perjuries
in relation to the possible checks. The other is the reaction to it
from the 'holocaust' protectors.
The interesting point is that these frauds have been maintained by all available means
until the lies became impossible to maintain (in some cases even beyond).
The argument here is not so much in each individual fraudulent claim,
but in statistics: a legend relying on testimony cannot afford so many lying witnesses.
Summing up:
What today is presented as 'notorious certainty', is admitted being a fake tomorrow.
The 'holocaust' legend has boldly defrauded us, for so long, so many times, in so many areas.
Why should we believe what is left of it?
Arg. A3: Complete lack of forensic evidence
"There is better evidence that extraterrestrial spacecraft have visited Earth
than there is that there was ever such a thing as a Nazi gas chamber.
Anonymous
Although the alleged 'gas chambers' have partly survived and
since decades are perfectly accessible to forensic investigation, there never was an
official expert report on the murder weapon of the 'holocaust'.
The
unofficial expert reports by revisionists
reveal major technical problems with the 'gas chambers' story and have been banned.
A3.1: No court ever asked for expert reports
The International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg is supposed to have set the supreme
legal standards of our time - 'crimes against humanity', 'conspiracy against peace' and so on.
One of the most amazing things about the IMT is that this divine legal institution
never bothered to order any
forensic investigation.
Nor any investigation whatsoever.
Worse, requirements for verification have been explicitly excluded by the charter of
the tribunal, the Statutes of London.
In fact, the IMT was set up to 'take judicial notice' of
supposed crimes, not to prove them.
The result is catastrophic: The
IMT not only consecrated the Sowjet Katyn fraud, the
Jewish soap, skin and shrunken head hoaxes, the six million (total)
and the four million (Auschwitz) numbers,
but also 'gas chambers' in Dachau and a lot more ...
all based on 'affidavits' - and all disproved since.
For allied post-war arrogance the idea of an international neutral commission
(such as the Germans proposed when they discovered the Sowjet mass murder at Katyn),
investigating 'gas chambers', would have been unacceptable ...
if the idea had come up.
But it didn't. Neither in Nuremberg, nor in the Frankfurt Auschwitz trials,
nor in the Jerusalem Eichmann trial.
The 'Holocaust' is self-evident, forensic experts could 'disturb the memory of the dead'.
A3.2: No realistic 'gas chamber' representation nowhere
Usually trumpeting and obtrusive, the legend is suspiciously reserved when it comes to physical detail of the murder weapon.
None of the many movies shows the functioning of a 'gas chamber' and no museum
has any realistic representation of it.
So what do the legend's holy places, the 'holocaust' museums, show as 'gas chamber'?
The USHMM in Washington shows an
artistic representation of Krema II
with no relation to reality and a casting of what is commonly considered a
delousing facility door of Majdanek, but
no representation of a gas chamber.
The Auschwitz Museum shows tourists a 'gas chamber in its original state'
without telling them it is a post-war
'reconstruction' in a morgue of Krema I,
a place many historians claim never served for gassing.
"Everything is wrong" in this reconstruction.
In Dachau, where we know since 1960 that
all gassing reports have been lies,
they show a room with false shower heads titled "gas chamber - never in use".
The stupid Germans, who 'deleted all traces of gassing',
left a brand new one for posterity.
A3.3: No autopsy stating 'gassed with Zyklon-B'
Thousands of dead inmate corpses have been examined by allied doctors.
No autopsy has concluded to death by poison gas.
Summing up:
Whereas each assassination attempt is investigated thoroughly with scientific methods,
the 'holocaust' trials never produced any independent expert report on the murder weapon.
The 'greatest crime in history' is not corroborated by forensic evidence.
Arg. A4: Six million killed without orders, plans, budgets
Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable"
The documentary evidence is not much better than the forensic one.
While we are told that the disciplined Germans planned and executed the
extermination of 6 million humans with industrial perfection,
there is no documentary trace of this gigantic enterprise.
Whereas the intentions, planning and execution of deportation are well-documented,
mass extermination - in particular human 'gassing' - is not.
A4.1: No Hitler order
Although
claimed (without proof) by many historians,
it is now clear that there is
no Hitler order and no document
from which it could be inferred Hitler even knew about mass extermination.
The legend is in trouble here:
either the German military is an undisciplined soldateska so bored in wartime
that they play around with poison gas cans killing millions of Jews
or there must have been orders at all levels - in fact a chain of commands
from the Hitler/Himmler level - leaving clear traces in the tons of
captured documents and the
secret transmissions.
A4.2: Need for document distortion
The holoscribe's solution of this dilemma is not very ingenious:
We are told that there was a secret language and the words in the documents didn't mean
what they mean in German but what the legend wants them to mean.
In this way
"final solution", "resettlement",
"special treatment",
"selection",
"special action" all mean "mass murder".
Read this way, many German wartime documents deal with mass murder.
A4.3: Double duty of poison gas
How about the poison gas allegedly used for the gassings,
the
Zyklon-B ? It must be produced,
ordered and delivered.
It is commonly admitted that Zyklon-B is a fumigant,
used to get rid of the deadly typhus-bearing body lice prevailing in eastern Europe,
in other words: a life saver.
On this crucial issue, the legend changed tactics several times.
Initially it was claimed "...very little
[of Zyklon-B] was used for fumigation"
and the mere quantity of (the well-documented) Zyklon-B shipments to Auschwitz
were triumphantly presented as proof of human gassing (and used to hang some Germans).
When it became known that about the same quantity (per inmate) was shipped to
'non-extermination camps', the legend reversed the argument 180°,
stating now that human gassing requires far less Zyklon-B than delousing.
Which has the advantage that the 'holocaust' cannot be disproved (nor proven)
on the basis of poison gas deliveries.
Summing up:
Unable to present documentary evidence in form of blue-prints, orders, budgets
the legend makes us believe in secret languages distorting the usual meaning of words
and the normal use of the fumigant Zyklon-B.
Arg. A5: Nobody acted as if mass extermination was happening
Whereas the legend relies on tons of post-war documents - mainly inmate testimony,
memoirs and SS 'confessions' - the revisionists
distrust such sources because of the obvious post-war pressures and witch-hunt atmosphere.
They place more confidence in genuine war-time documents except those too clearly stemming
from propaganda efforts.
However, filtering war-time documents, speeches, actions and reactions through the
'extermination looking-glass', there is one puzzling thing:
nobody acted as if the 'holocaust' really happened.
'Holocaust' historians have devoted
entire studies to that subject.
A5.1: Secret services: don't believe it
Sure, there were some extermination reports from the Polish underground or Jewish
circles, echoed back through BBC and other propaganda channels to the occupied
countries, closing the feed back loop of rumors.
But there is plenty of evidence that the allied secret services didn't take
it for reality. To spread propaganda is one thing, another is to believe it.
Nor felt the German government obliged to officially react to it:
'du deja vu', 'we've seen it all before', in WWI.
Until the very end of the war, the allied governments did never formally accuse Germany
of mass extermination.
And they knew why: the Germans could have invited a neutral inspection of the camps,
turning the allied accusations into a boomerang.
A5.2: Red Cross: inspected the camps
In fact, the International Committee of the Red Cross was allowed in war-time
to inspect camps, including Auschwitz and, more importantly, it supervised a huge
parcel distribution program to the inmates.
There were no war-time reports hinting at mass extermination from the ICRC and
although the ICRC's post-war policy is somewhat dubious (historians complain
that the ICRC is hiding documents) it cannot be taken as a 'holocaust'
witness.
A5.3: Vatican: no condemnation of mass extermination
The ICRC was in close contact with the Vatican. The Catholic Church can be considered the
best informed institution during wartime. Priests were not only omnipresent in the
mostly catholic countries occupied (Poland, Hungary, France,...) but also within the German army.
Despite allied pressure, the Vatican officially only condemned the deportations,
never mentioning mass extermination, which could obviously not be confirmed by its
wide network of information possibilities.
A5.4: The Jews themselves didn't believe it
Last but not least: The Jewish organizations in the occupied countries failed to warn their
coreligionists of the 'extermination' fate.
It is well known that the Jews did not resist deportation,
which they would have done, if they suspected being gassed on arrival.
Summing up:
During the war, the best-informed organizations including Jewish dignitaries
- despite being alerted - did not act as if any mass extermination was ongoing.
© Colectivo Tropical de Revisionismo, Centroamérica
last update: 28-May-09 (11:38)
