Colectivo
Tropical de
Revisionismo
© 2004-2010 |
| ||||||
| Recent articles Revisionism 'Holocaust' ⇒The 'Holocaust'-Religion A tainted consumer product Debunking the 'Holocaust' Fraud Auschwitz:Facts & Legends Israel & the 'Holocaust' Fraud Frequently Asked Questions Hoaxes 'Jewish Soap' Hypocrisy Costa Rica Haiti Downloads / Links Forum Search This Site |
"We believe it profoundly vulgar, and emasculating, to spend half a century condemning others
for their violence and brutality when we have not yet learned to condemn our own,
or even recognize it. We want to help civilize Americans."
60 years after the end of WWII, concentration camp literature and films are pounding their message into the globalized brains at rhythms never known. Facts, fictions and frauds intermix in cocktails targeted for the 'willing believers', spreading hatred and disinformation.
When history meets business, truth is an ingredient dosed according to the dominating doctrines.
In this section, Vistas Revisionistas will analyze the phenomenon called 'holocaust'. Although the 'holocaust' is certainly not the only fraud born from allied war propaganda, it is the one that has the most far-reaching consequences since it serves as the founding myth of Israel and post-war Germany as well as the myth underlying the New World Order.
The 'Holocaust'-Religion
Colectivo Tropical de Revisionismo (CTR)
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time,
but you can't fool all the people all of the time."
Abraham Lincoln
The term 'holocaust' originated in the seventies through a NBC soap opera (stating that "we all are guilty").
Although the term is inadequate, the phenomenon badly defined and most of the facts without proof,
the 'holocaust' has become the religion of our atheistic age, replacing
Christianity - at least in western cultures.
Without regularly affirming belief in the 'holocaust', no western politician would ever dare to run for whatever office, no journalist would ever get a column in his local newspaper and even the most garrulous TV-presenter would be stripped of her talk show.
Without generously feeding the 'fund raising' campaigns of the high priests of 'holocaust'
no second class actor would aspire to become governor of California nor any other state.
Without regular prostration before the tabernacle of 'holocaust', proclaiming the magic phrases,
no president would stay in charge of his country.
The magic formulas prescribed by the ritual are affirming the dogmas of the religion:
Theology without foundation
However, they are praying in front of an empty tabernacle, none of the daily repeated creeds
resists criticism:
Official frauds of the legend
Whilst they never presented the slightest proof of an extermination plan,
nor for the 6 millions, nor of 'gas chambers', other allegations of the 'holocaust'
peddlers could be clearly proven ... as frauds.
Of course we only present some samples of frauds admitted officially,
not those frauds that remain to be admitted.
In 1990 the Vashem Museum in Israel confirmed officially that these were 'rumors' without
foundation [Web-Soa].
In 1960 the legend officially confirmed that in none of the above camps -
in fact in no camps in Germany - there have ever been (homicidal) gas chambers
(only in Poland, beyond the iron curtain) [Bro-Zei].
These are only sketchy examples, not a comprehensive list. Genocide proof by affidavit
It is hard to believe that there are no material proofs of the 'holocaust'.
But those who expect that
had been verified by the
are taking a legal stance, not a theological one.
The 'holocaust' legend is based - as each religion - on testimonies collected by those
already having the faith (allied military tribunals and Jewish historians).
And as for every religion the miraculous part is mixed with a few verifiable facts of double
duty, all of which with rather mundane interpretations -
in addition to the legendary one.
It is worth pausing at this point:
6 million murdered (population of a country as Switzerland)
without leaving a trace: Millions gassed and no autopsies certifying death by poison gas ? Not a single one.
What do they say happened to the corpses?
They say they were all burned completely in crematories.
But the allies found piles of corpses liberating the camps !?
Yes, but none gassed, as the allies' own physicians confirmed, who investigated thousands of them.
They died from malnutrition, air raids and mainly from epidemics (typhoid, dysentery)
of the chaotical last months, when German infrastructure broke down.
Genesis of a legend
Already in the first World War the allies used atrocity propaganda with a brazenness surprising
German warfare mentality. The soap production was already part of it, as were the
6 million [Gly-Cru], Belgian babies, crucified Canadians and so on.
The lies were so absurd that the British foreign office felt the need to apologize
after WWI.
This did not prevent the resurrection of the same atrocity propaganda and some more
during the Second World War, most of which originating from Zionist circles or
Polish underground and today abandoned (without apology).
Interestingly, in these reports exterminations in Auschwitz appeared very late,
and have not been taken seriously by the allies' secret services, despite - or better because -
their excellent informations concerning Auschwitz (which was an important industrial center).
It was not until end of 1944, when according to the legend 'gassings' had already been stopped,
that the US alleged extermination at Auschwitz, based on reports of refugees remaining anonymous
(even after the war).
The Sowjets entered Auschwitz at the beginning of 1945 and three month later announced that 4 millions had been killed in the camp, without providing evidence or allowing independent inspection, of course. In bombed and defenseless Germany the western allies proceeded in the same manner. They presented the world press under their control piles of corpses found near the camps and elsewhere - some of which their own air raid victims - as evidence of mass extermination and disinfection rooms as 'gas chambers'. As mentioned above, these infamous lies have been abandoned in the 60ies [JHR-Wie].
Dogmatism in times of universal democracy
And how could a fraud of this magnitude be maintained without being objected publicly ?
Simple: the dogmas of the 'holocaust' are maintained
as the others: with pressure, money and the most
ferocious judicial terror since the witch trials.
There have always been objections against the allied post-war justice masquerades, the Auschwitz
myth, the 6 million and other 'holocaust' hoaxes,
but the licensed media could manage to keep their impact low.
When end of the 70ies more revisionists came up requesting scientific historical procedures and
evidence for the 'gas chambers', the historians realized that there is no such evidence and evaded
any direct confrontation with revisionist theories.
When the revisionists provided evidence and forensic investigations proving the impossibility
of as well the 6 million as the extermination method, Jewish organizations called for
laws punishing such sacrilege.
However, what has been conceived to silence revisionists, has turned into their best publicity. In fact, many who saw no reason to mistrust the inculcated version, began to scrutinize the 'truths of the holocaust', truths so notorious, that they require police protection. And as everyone who starts looking at the poor collection of confuse testimonies, unfounded allegations and technical impossibilities on which the legend is based, they end up feeling defrauded by their sloppy historians, servile politicians and 'critical' journalists. Details of revisionist argumentation
Of course, here we cannot reproduce the revisionist argumentation, with all its technical details
... tecnical details crucially lacking from the lachrymose narrations of the guardians of "Truth and Memory".
However, we provide a summary of the main arguments against the 'holocaust' legend,
as perceived by our group.
The interested reader is referred to revisionist texts nearly all of which are available on
internet.
Here are some recommendations. Introductions:
|